The Psychological Immune System

· Simulated happiness - as good as the real thing ·

July 7, 2016 3 Comments

Mr. Cogito's Envoy-Zbiegnew Hrbert

Yesterday I described how feeble we are at affective forecasting, the ability to predict how we will be feeling in the future. The impact bias has us think that there will be much more of an impact by both negative and positive events than what we are actually going to feel. Today I have something good to report (although in some ways it is also at the root of why we are not very good at predicting.)

Just as the body has a physiological immune system that works hard to keep us healthy, so has the mind. Our brain works on overdrive, although mostly in non-conscious processes, to help us change our views of the world so that we can feel better about the world in which we find ourselves. In Harvard psychologist Dan Gilbert’s term, we synthesize happiness, not just rationalizing the choice we made and the situation we find ourselves in, but experiencing positive affect in our brains for choices we’ve made. Here is a short TED talk that brilliantly explains it (https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_gilbert_asks_why_are_we_happy?language=en). I promise you’ll be astounded.

So you’ve made a choice, you are stuck with it, your liking increases steadily for the outcome. What if I gave you a chance to re-think your choice, though? You’d think with increasing freedom to choose, things would turn out better. They don’t. You are less happy with what you have if you constantly wonder about the alternatives and question consciously if you made the right decision. Multiple alternatives, in other words, do not only make you potentially indecisive, but they also undermine the psychological immune system that sets in when you are settled with something and try to make the best of it. Work that expands on this paradox of choice and has been much discussed lately is that of Barry Schwartz – it will make you rethink consumerism. More on that tomorrow.

East Coast Nightcap 1 copy

Gilbert’s Harvard experiments, by the way, use art as stimuli, a selection of impressionist prints and choices between prints of photographs taken in a photography course. No wonder I became interested. In general, though, research into happiness is a hot topic in contemporary psychology.

friderikeheuer@gmail.com

3 Comments

  1. Reply

    Steve Tilden

    July 7, 2016

    That TED talk was indeed very interesting. I have always tended to be a glass-half-full kind of fellow, and I see I come by it naturally. The bad things I have done in my life still bother me, but not that much; my immune system works pretty well.

    Is religious fervor a manifestation of that immune system? If so, why has it not gripped me?

  2. Reply

    Lee Musgrave

    July 7, 2016

    During my many years of teaching in Los Angeles I had lots of students from non-western countries. I was always amazed at how many of them would express their dislike of having so many choices available to them here in the USA. Simple things like having to select a morning breakfast cereal from a variety of over 50 would depress, irritate and at times even anger them. They expressed the feeling of being frightened and stressed by constantly having to make decisions. Most of them came from cultures were everyone looked more or less the same, dressed the same, acted and spoke the same, and believed the same about everything. That sameness gave them security in body and mind. The only other group I’ve ever heard express a similar feeling has been military men.

    • Reply

      friderikeheuer@gmail.com

      July 7, 2016

      I haven’t even started on cross cultural differences…. the picture is exceedingly complex.

LEAVE A COMMENT

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

RELATED POST