Parks and Poppies
· How politics shape our environments ·

Don’t you love it when a book review leaves no doubt about what to read? For example, Andrea Wulf writes, “Here is my review of Stephen Buchmann’s “The Reason for Flowers” – which is a pretty terrible book. Very rambling and not enjoyable. Shame.” She herself is the justly celebrated author of The Invention of Nature, a fabulous book about the ecological visionary and humanist, Alexander von Humboldt. Ok, ignore one, read the other.
Also on my reserve-at-the-library – list: A Walk in the Park, by social historian Travis Elborough. I read the attached review in the Financial Times and was sold, particularly since the writing was claimed to have a “Monty Python-ish strain.”
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/5b07fe36-2bf5-11e6-bf8d-26294ad519fc.html
According to the review the book traces the history of public parks including their role (in the eye of philanthropic Victorians) to pacify the urban poor. Post WW I park creation was increased to enhance physical fitness in young men, having shown lamentable lack thereof when conscripted earlier. And of course now parks are making way for ever larger number of shopping malls… I find it interesting to learn about what social, political or economic pressures shape environments that we take for granted.
Take the cultivation of poppies, for example, the plant from which opium and its derivatives are extracted (the German company Bayer started to produce heroin in the late 1800s, sold by the truckload to combat opium addiction in the US until it became clear that it itself was highly addictive.) The review from The Guardian below makes it clear that Julia Lovell’s book Opium War Drugs, Dreams and the Making of China should be quite the eye-opener when it comes to politics and flowers. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/sep/02/opium-war-julia-lovell-review

Am I the only one who finds it ironic that the West has declared a war on drugs in the 20th century, when Great Britain and later France declared war twice on China in the 1800s because it tried to prohibit Western nations to sell opium in China? In the 1820s China had up to 10 Million opium smokers and addicts because of the import of opium by the British from Burma in exchange for the coveted Chinese tea. The emperor decided to ban the use of the opium which did not sit well with the sellers. The West was victorious in both wars and extracted hefty concessions from China, both monetary and in terms of ceded land (think Hongkong.) More long lasting, though, is how these wars shaped Chinese nationalism and its underlying structural narrative. It might still come to haunt us.
These days Afghanistan has surpassed Burma in production of opium and participates in a multibillion dollar heroin trade that benefits not just indigent political movements like the Taliban, but also organized crime and a lot of our own financial institutions because of money laundering in Western banks. The numbers about the production are mind boggling and can be found here http://www.unodc.org/documents/crop-monitoring/Afghanistan/Afghan-opium-survey-2014.pdf
And all this from such a dainty little flower……
Emil Nolde: Grosser Mohn 



much less be successful.
They need vision – a plan, a sense of design, the ability to translate from a piece of drawing paper to the visualization of how things look like. They need patience, because things evolve slowly. They need a high tolerance for lack of control, because each garden has its own mind, and things never work out as planned. They also need to like things ephemeral, or at least accept that state, because things happen quickly and are gone before you blink when it comes to blooming season.
The latter kind also introduces some additional requirements: you need to be able to lead a team and work with others, since the tasks cannot be done by one person alone, and you need to have the openness to accept your team mates’ ideas – since everyone who steadily tends to a large garden develops a sense of ownership. You need to be able to convey that you call the shots without feeling guilty and you need – let’s be blunt – some serious financial commitment, since large gardens are not a cheap passion.

























Some years back, shortly after the show Portlandia had targeted the intersection between art and commercialism with the meme Put a Bird on it!, some cultural journalist in Salon wrote about her acute discomfort when purchasing bird-related art and/or craft. She had become self-conscious in the wake of the joke, wondering if she – as so many of us – was the butt of it. She described the feeling with a newly invented German term – der Vogelschäme – which cracked me up since it captured the emotional reaction perfectly, but was all wrong linguistically. (It would be die Vogelscham – the bird shame.)
In the small German village where I grew up villager solidarity increased proportionally to the amount of nightly noise produced by a band of roaming peacocks. A miniature version of this is happening in my current neighborhood where the neighborly greetings of each other start with the question, “did they keep you up all night as well?” A pair of very loud and very much in love owls is filling the air from sun down to sun rise.
After more than 5 years of sending a daily picture to an ever growing number of people via email I have now shifted to the blog format. There will be a daily photograph or montage, there will be a weekly theme that holds the images together and, of course, there will be the occasional text. The only change will be the way in which it can be accessed. You can go to the site anytime you wish at