Browsing Category

Psychology

Luck

Perhaps it is no accident that we found ourselves discussing the issue of luck at a place that serves fortune cookies. Surrounded by large Chinese families, screaming babies, delicious food, a general hustle and bustle at this huge restaurant where we regularly meet friends, the talk turned to randomness and moral privilege.

I learned – since I grab my education even with my mouth full of fried rice – that the Babylonian Talmud’s Tractate Moed Katan quotes Rava, one of the rabbinic text’s greatest sages, saying that “length of life, children and sustenance depend not on merit but rather on Mazzal.”  That debate started around the belief that people who die young had been punished for a reason, while those who lived long did so on merits. Rava countered those assumptions with an examples of two equally upright rabbis, Rabba and Rav Hisdah, who died young and aged respectively, and whose families experienced corresponding economic decline and ascent. Rava’s assumption that outcome is not divinely predetermined but due to chance factors predates the copernican revolution by about 15oo years!

So what does Mazzal refer to? Plain luck? Matters outside of your control? Elements of our lives over which we have no direct influence – our genes, the place where we were born or when, the socio-economic class we grew up in – or simply randomness?

I am not sure if that was ever clarified by Jewish sages, but I know that the issue is not exactly resolved today either. So many people cling to the notion (phrased by psychologist Barry Schwartz) that People get what they deserve and they deserve what they get. In this case you assign credit for outcomes, good or bad by assuming it all or mostly lies within the realm of your own responsibility. Correspondingly, you have no moral obligation to help those who suffer bad outcomes, since it’s their own fault.

Alternatively, you acknowledge that outside chance factors play a huge role in outcome; if they systematically disenfranchise some we might be morally obliged to help them overcome harsh factors that led to their disadvantaged lives if we have been the more fortunate ones.

What we know from psychology is that you bring with you a genetic makeup that sets the path; you also encounter environmental influences that shape you and which play a role in your ability to escape a given path, should it be a bad one.  The interaction of these factors try to explain the range of control you have over your fate.

Note that both, genetic make-up and the context you find yourself in, happen to you – if you happen to be born with a certain genetic predisposition towards a disease and you are born in a country where that disease can be fought with easily accessible drugs you are in the clear. If you are born in a country without access to those meds you are sunk. Same for having a specific intelligence level and lucking out on having a rich daddy or not, access to a good school or not, neighborhoods without lead in the water etc…. in other words, both what you bring and what you encounter are pretty much outside of your control when you are young.

What about when you are an adult? Does the merit assumption kick in when you are old enough to take your fate into your own hands?  Can you take on responsibility over your life’s circumstances? Make god decisions based on deliberate, rational reasoning rather than following spontaneous base impulses? Maybe that is where you deserve moral credit and the whole idea of meritocracy resides: you keep your impulses in check and choose the high road? Miraculously your hard work gets you access to education, riches follow? You don’t smoke so don’t get cancer? Life improvement is all about personal choice?

Won’t work. Both the capacity for deliberate, rational thinking as well as the need to apply it are unevenly – and unjustly – distributed.

Using rational, deliberate, slow and measured thinking thinking is difficult; additional strain on your system leaves few resources that you can use to accomplish this difficult task. In other words, the capacity that leads to better behavior is dependent on having more basic needs already fulfilled: enough food, physical shelter, educational training and habituation. Your ability to use it depends on external factors, in other words.  And even if you were able to use it, say, to decide that hard works gets you into situations that improve your state – access to education which in the end is what it’s about in societies like ours, is not guaranteed. Exclusion on the basis of race and class and set early in life cannot be overcome by good decision making alone.

The need to apply self control is differentially distributed as well – again an external factor. If you have enough external resources – money, lawyers, social and political connections – you don’t need to curb your baser impulses. You just need to have someone clean up their horrid consequence. (Note, I didn’t need to mention any names.) In contrast if you are a female black tennis player and loose it with the umpire, you are held to the highest degree of demanded self-control, needed to not be censured and punished.

Of course if you acknowledge all this, the lucky feel threatened, since they cling to their belief that it is all about their own actions. That opportunistic assumption has moral consequences – how we all engage in projects to assure a more just distribution of resources.  Luck,then, has pretty harsh effects beyond the positive ones of singling out the lucky ones.

Below is a link to a good summary article.

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/8/21/17687402/kylie-jenner-luck-human-life-moral-privilege

Photographs today are of swallows – long thought to bring luck to the farms where they nest.

Mind Wandering

Hard to write when it’s hot, the weekend is looming, and vacation is not quite around the corner but beckoning from the recesses of my mind…..

My mind starts to wander, engaging in pleasant fantasies about what I’ll encounter in August, what adventures I might have and what new sights wait to be photographed. Will the future unravel from mysterious heaps like this?

Which tells you right there that your daily essayist is a happy(ish) person, since mind wandering into the future is associated with a positive outlook on life, while mind wandering into the past is more often encountered with people who are unhappy.

By rough estimates we spend about 25% of our waking day with wandering thoughts, that state where we are meant to focus on one thing, but find ourselves all of a sudden thinking about something altogether different. Not in any goal directed fashion either, but just drifting about. The strange thing is that for some time you are not aware that your thoughts have taken a path of their own, but when you realize it you are perfectly able to pinpoint what you have been thinking about.

Slovenia, hah! Balkan anti-fascist memorials hunt. International Graffiti Festival. Viennese Apple Strudel. Pack rain coat yes or no?  All while really trying to focus on the blog.

Mind wandering can be consequential and not just for lost time on the job – car accidents happen during that state just as often as with drunk driving. I wouldn’t want the flight traffic controller to engage in mental time travel either. So not an entirely good preoccupation. There is, however some reason to believe that mind wandering enhances creativity; you can stumble, researchers speculate, on previously unlinked ideas that pave the path for novel insights. It certainly does relieve boredom, which is another basically good thing.

So how do you keep yourself on task? Active engagement with whatever you are doing seems to be helpful. (Not just passive reading but re-wording concepts and structuring them for my YDP then should do the trick for me…) Training in mindfulness, whether through brief breathing exercises or longer concentrated practice also improves your ability to stay focused.

If you want to read in great detail about it, go here (before your mind wanders….): https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/schooler/jonathan/sites/labs.psych.ucsb.edu.schooler.jonathan/files/pubs/middle_way.pdf

 

Spotting Spot

Many argue such a thing as an “educated eye” exists and makes for being a better eye witness, a better referee, a better chess player or better at judging dogs at dog shows. True or false?

In the courtrooms, for example, judges and juries are especially likely to accept the witness’s report as accurate if the witness is a police officer. It is believed that police have “educated eyes,” with the result that they can recognize faces that they viewed only briefly or at a considerable distance or in the dark after years of night shifts.

On the one hand, this ignores that there are optical properties of the eyeball and functional properties of the photoreceptors which are the same for all of us and don’t change or improve with use for any particular profession. All of us simply can’t see very well in the dark or at far distances.

At a different level, though, it is possible to have an “educated eye”—or, more precisely, to be more observant and more discerning than other people.

For example, when looking at a complex, fast-moving crime scene, police officers are more likely to focus their attention on details that will matter for the investigation—and so will likely see (and remember) more of the perpetrator’s actions (although, ironically, this means they’ll see less of what’s happening elsewhere in the scene).

In the same way, referees and umpires in professional sports know exactly what to focus on during a game. As a result, they’ll see things that ordinary observers would miss. (Fans at the FIFA World Cup in Russia right now might disagree, but trust me.)

 

The mechanisms are similar to what I described yesterday for auditory input: expectation guides your attention and your ability to interpret or parse a scene.  For visual inputs you can only see detail that is landing on your foveas; what lands on your foveas depends on where exactly you’re pointing your eyes; and movements of the eyes (pointing them first here and then there) turn out to be relatively slow. As a result, knowledge about where to look has an immense impact on what you’ll be able to see.

It’s also true that experience can help you to see certain patterns that the rest of us miss. Consider the dog experts who serve as judges at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show. These experts are sensitive to each dog’s overall form, and not just the shape of the front legs, the chest, the ears, and so on, with the result that they can make more discerning assessments than an ordinary dog-lover could.

Although all of us can enjoy one of the funniest movies ever made, dogs and all –

Experience can also help you to see (or hear or feel) certain combinations that are especially important or informative. One prominent example involves experienced firefighters who sometimes have an eerie ability to judge when a floor is about to collapse—allowing these professionals to evacuate a building in time, saving their lives and others’. What explains this perception? The answer may be a combination of feeling an especially high temperature and hearing relative quiet — a combination that signals a ferocious fire burning underneath them, hidden under the floor that they’re standing on.

 

In short, then, people can have “educated eyes” (or ears or noses or palates). This “education” can’t change the basic biological properties of your sense organs. But knowledge and experience can certainly help you to see things that others overlook, to detect patterns that are largely invisible to other people.

Hidden Messages

Happy 4th of July – where you will be bombarded with messages about the state of our nation. Let’s look at a different kind of message, though: You have probably heard periodic reports  of “secret messages” contained within pop music – often messages that can be revealed only by playing the music backwards. The messages are claimed to have content that is upsetting or offensive to many people – messages about Satan (thus today’s photographs of hellish creatures), or drug use, or sexual activity. If you take the time to do the quick exercise below exposing you to this music, you will be truly astonished (and laugh!). At least I was/did when I tried it out.

Visit this website: It lets you hear something that might or might not contain a hidden message.

http://jeffmilner.com/backmasking/stairway-to-heaven-backwards.html

First, select  the sound clips and play it forwards. Try at that point to guess what the hidden message is.

Then play the clip backwards. Now can you guess what the hidden message is?

Then, as the crucial step, click on the button to reveal the lyrics that are supposedly hidden in the backwards clip, and play the clip again. Now can you hear the hidden message?

So: Is the message really there, because you can hear it? Probably not.  You can only hear it when someone explicitly suggests to you what the message is which provides a powerful demonstration that your perception can be guided by expectations and knowledge – so that you can hear things with that guidance that you can’t hear at all otherwise.

Perception, then, is not just a relatively passive process where you are simply exposed to sounds, and they flow into your ears and you hear. Perception is much more active than that. You interpret. You fill in. You add. Of course, the ‘balance’ between the input and your activity shifts. The clearer the input, the more you rely on it. The LESS clear the input, the more you supplement. Likewise, the stronger your expectations and assumptions, the more you rely on them. The WEAKER your expectations and assumptions, the less you rely on them.

The bottom line, though, is NOT that perception is hopelessly and inevitably subjective. When the input is clear, you rely on the input! But, when the input isn’t clear, you do need to be alert to how much your expectations can bias what you see and hear.

Facts, ignored.

# Stay Special

I listed some psychological research yesterday for claims that child/ parent separation has lasting, harmful effects. We might as well continue with psychology for the rest of the week, offering what I hope are a few interesting psychological tidbits.

My sister and I have an ongoing joke between us that refers to my childhood desire to be a famous Hollywood star rather than holding any number of other potentially interesting roles in life. Man, did I miss the bus. That aside, what is it about that longing to be famous? My best speculation has to do with my lifelong preoccupation with mortality, a preoccupation I have surely earned, given the frequent encounters with that crap starting at an early age. That, or a deep streak of narcissism….

If mortality concerns you, you want to have something that lasts beyond your mere existence, I guess. Fame, in other words. And so, any time I get a photo into an exhibit, my beloved sister exclaims:”NOW you are famous! You can rest!”

As a scientist, and a person living in an environment where science is under daily assault, one might want to remember how you put a claim to a test. Is it factually true? Is the evidence weak and ambiguous or indisputable? How precisely must a hypothesis be worded, to make it testable? All matter if we want to be able to trust findings.

Consider the claim “No matter what day of the year you pick, a famous photographer was born on that day.” A search on Google reveals, for sake of argument, that Friderike Heuer is the only photographer born on March 19. Does this observation support the initial claim, because Heuer is famous? (After all, hundreds of people have seen her art or read her blog.) Or does it contradict the claim, because Heuer isn’t famous? (After all, most people have never heard of her.) Both of these positions seem plausible, and so your “test” of this claim about birthdays turns out to depend on opinion, not fact: If you hold the opinion that Heuer is famous, then the evidence about the March 19 birthday confirms the claim; if you hold the opposite opinion, the same evidence doesn’t confirm the claim. As a result, this claim is not testable—there’s no way to say with certainty whether it fits with the facts or not since an essential element in your claim lacked precision – fame had to be defined. (Note that I did not ask to evaluate the hypothesis that Heuer IS famous – you didn’t think I’d be going there, would you now?)

Many feel that scientific facts, even if derived with the appropriate processes, no longer matter, in a political world that has moved beyond facts. Some argue that trying to use facts to convince those who adhere to lies is even counterproductive – see the attached below.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/02/counter_lies_with_emotions_not_facts.html

It is certainly a huge burden for the scientific community who did and does worry about getting the facts right to now having to think about ways of overcoming public resistance to those very facts (although not for the first time in history.) Figuring out how to do that is obviously essential for subsequent action that protects our and the world’s well-being, whether we think environmental harm, or disease control, resource distribution or multiple other areas. Maybe someone famous will figure it out.

 

 

What Country is this?

Today I will let the pictures speak for themselves, mostly. They were taken at Saturday’s rally to protest the separation of children from their families as a result of the Trump administrations’ policies on immigration and asylum.

Over 250.ooo people marched across the cities of the U.S., some 5000 here in PDX, to give voice to their disgust and anger – you wouldn’t know those number if you read the conservative media.

 

 

 

 

Senator Ron Wyden, who is really rising to the occasion, gave an impassioned and clever speech, leading the crowd in 0 – 10 scoring of Trump’s zero-tolerance and other policies with resounding shouts of ZERO.

Signs ranged from outraged to funny, offered by imploring 7-week olds to raging grannies and grandpas.

 

 

 

As always, a sense of shared purpose and solidarity gave rise to smidgens of hope.

For those of you interested in the science behind the claims that separating infants from their mothers and fathers has life-long consequences, as expressed not only in attachment disorders but also in neurophysiological changes that can affect a range of psychological developments, I refer to the articles below.

https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/observer/obsonline/how-mother-child-separation-causes-neurobiological-vulnerability-into-adulthood.html

 

http://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/06/neglect.aspx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And then there is this about stolen adoptions: https://theintercept.com/2018/07/01/separated-children-adoption-immigration/

Maman

After reading that the Red Cross has been denied access to the migrant detention camps and that a Betsy deVos-linked evangelical agency is rumored to place the separated newborns and toddlers for adoption, I decided to give myself permission not to read and write much about politics this week. My – and your – sanity probably once again depends on it.

I have moral support for my chosen state of not-knowing, if only for a few precious days, from an unexpected source: a scientific argument in favor of willful ignorance. The argument, developed by two researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in the context of data collection and dissemination through Artificial Intelligence, in a nutshell is this:

People often decide to remain ignorant because they know that knowledge can be dangerous. It can corrupt judgment – just think of personal medical data, your sexual preferences, your religion – known to hiring agencies or insurance companies or your favorite internet troll. Do you want them to be known? It can instill fear – do you want to know your likely day of death or chance of developing Alzheimers, which many AI programs are statistically predicting in ever more accurate fashion?

Motives for willful ignorance then center around two themes: impartiality and fairness, for one, and emotional regulation and regret avoidance, for another.  Detailed description of the argument can be found in the link attached below.

http://nautil.us//issue/61/coordinates/we-need-to-save-ignorance-from-ai?utm_source=Nautilus&utm_campaign=3d24b9bbbd-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_06_22_07_57&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_dc96ec7a9d-3d24b9bbbd-61805813

Speaking to the issue of impartiality: many women artists have taken to apply for exhibitions with initials for first name, or aliases in general, so their gender remains unknown – a precaution in an art world that is still very much a male domaine and known to exclude the second sex. (I use that phrase to remind us of de Beauvoir’s pathbreaking analysis of facts and myths about women, written in 1949 and just as applicable today.)

 

But this week their names will be available to us, at least those I chose for presentation.

The first shall be Louise Bourgeois, and her 1999 spider sculpture titled  Maman. I think I wrote about Bourgeois here two years ago, but I always find myself going back to this marble and steel miracle, grandiose in scale and hauntingly contradictory in effect. Most people shy away from arachnids, find them disgusting if not threatening. The artist’s associations, though, are couched in love, admiration and pragmatism. They stress the purpose of protection and yet the sculpture emanates a power closely linked to fear. The ambiguity is breathtaking.

“The Spider is an ode to my mother. She was my best friend. Like a spider, my mother was a weaver. My family was in the business of tapestry restoration, and my mother was in charge of the workshop. Like spiders, my mother was very clever. Spiders are friendly presences that eat mosquitoes. We know that mosquitoes spread diseases and are therefore unwanted. So, spiders are helpful and protective, just like my mother.”

“…..my best friend was my mother and she was deliberate, clever, patient, soothing, reasonable, dainty, subtle, indispensable, neat, and as useful as a spider. She could also defend herself, and me…” Louise Bourgeois.

My photographs are from 2012 at the Hamburger Kunsthalle celebrating the artist’s 100th birthday.

Below are alternative sites from the web – Maman sure likes to travel…..

 

 

 

 

Courage

My father died 16 years ago in June. I have been thinking about him a lot lately because I coincidentally came across articles or TED talks that featured amputees who publicly discussed the choices they made in life after the assaults on their bodies. They also publicly display their protheses, which are streamlined, light, robotic looking extensions that allow for a lot of movement.

In 1942 when my father lost both of his legs in the war, just turning 20 years old, it was a different story. There was shame attached to having the protheses visible; equally important, the artificial limbs were made first of wood, then some heavy plastic, all of which needed to be carried and tied on with a heavy leather cone with multiple belt buckles, that was hellishly hot and air tight. The things made noise, too, squeaking and grinding, increasing the embarassment. Amputees were often shunned in a country that tried to forget about its history and the war, for which they were visible reminders.

Standing all day at a lab bench early in his career as a chemist was in itself an athletic feat, one for which he paid dearly with nightly blisters on the parts of his legs that attached to the protheses. But he would not be stopped. He had been in a major league handball team before the war. Physical activity had to be continued – and so he figured out what he could do. I learned to play table tennis from my father. I saw him horseback riding, and later, when we would spend winters skiing in Switzerland, he would actually go curling. A SPORT WHERE YOU HAVE TO WALK/RUN/CROUCH ON ICE.  In summers in Holland he would go before dawn to the North Sea and swim, before anyone could see him putting the wooden legs off and on. And he rode his bike. Determined. Unstoppable.

Nowadays there are at least possibilities for those who went through these traumas to receive help, or find and work with those who share the experience. If a team like the one described below had existed in the 1950s my father would have probably joined.

This All-Amputee Softball Team is Changing the Way We Think About Treating Trauma

The physical consequences of the amputations and the decades of pain meds needed to be able to function on a daily basis made his last years particularly difficult, independent of the PTSD. I wish he had had someone at his side like the palliative care physician featured in the TED talk below. It would have made a difference, I believe.

It is only with hindsight that I am able to understand the full extent of courage it took to lead the life he led without ever becoming hard. I try to remember that every time I become upset over some little chickenshit, as they say in polite company….

Photographs are bikes in Alkmaar and Bergen aan Zee, NL.

 

 

 

 

Seeing Red.

You might think I am referring to this in our last entry to a week of colors:

Which would not be a bad guess in general, but today the color RED is brought to you by LOVE.  My love for humanity in general

 

 

 

and my love for one human being in particular who was born just this week 30 years ago.

He introduced me to Zbigniew Herbert and one of my favorite poems of his expresses the idea of moral necessity as perfectly as the concept is embraced by my incredible 30-year-old.  Happy almost Birthday, mein Süssen!!!! Keep the spark alive.

The Envoy of Mr. Cogito

TRANSLATED BY BOGDANA CARPENTER
Go where those others went to the dark boundary
for the golden fleece of nothingness your last prize
go upright among those who are on their knees
among those with their backs turned and those toppled in the dust
you were saved not in order to live
you have little time you must give testimony
be courageous when the mind deceives you be courageous
in the final account only this is important
and let your helpless Anger be like the sea
whenever you hear the voice of the insulted and beaten
let your sister Scorn not leave you
for the informers executioners cowards—they will win
they will go to your funeral and with relief will throw a lump of earth
the woodborer will write your smoothed-over biography
and do not forgive truly it is not in your power
to forgive in the name of those betrayed at dawn
beware however of unnecessary pride
keep looking at your clown’s face in the mirror
repeat: I was called—weren’t there better ones than I
beware of dryness of heart love the morning spring
the bird with an unknown name the winter oak
light on a wall the splendour of the sky
they don’t need your warm breath
they are there to say: no one will console you
be vigilant—when the light on the mountains gives the sign—arise and go
as long as blood turns in the breast your dark star
repeat old incantations of humanity fables and legends
because this is how you will attain the good you will not attain
repeat great words repeat them stubbornly
like those crossing the desert who perished in the sand
and they will reward you with what they have at hand
with the whip of laughter with murder on a garbage heap
go because only in this way will you be admitted to the company of cold skulls
to the company of your ancestors: Gilgamesh Hector Roland
the defenders of the kingdom without limit and the city of ashes
Be faithful Go
Zbigniew Herbert, “The Envoy of Mr. Cogito,” translated by Bogdana and John Carpenter, from Selected Poems of Zbigniew Herbert. Used by permission of Oxford University Press, Ltd.

Pink Cheeks. Black Lashes.

Sometimes I wonder if there is a correlation between drab times and the amount of colored cream or powder humanity applies to its faces. I sure found a lot of pink when walking through PDX and approaching these young beauties with requests for photographs. I was also aware last time I visited NYC how many young men were dripping with mascara.

No drab times for the make-up industry though, which has finally figured out a way to make half of the population which was so far unreachable become consumers of beautification products. Check out the short video below and see for yourself how young men are starting to buy and apply make-up.

http://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-asia-42869170/male-make-up-korean-men-have-started-a-beauty-revolution?ocid=socialflow_twitter

It would have been amusing were it not for the prejudiced protestations of the protagonist that he was not gay, just into make-up, and for my fear that the peddling of useless goods is just another way of emptying people’s pockets, now young boys’.

For someone whose currency of felt appreciation has changed across the years from being smiled and whistled at to the number of replies to a blog segment, make-up plays no longer any role. But I understand the need of youth to soothe self doubts and insecurity. I have certainly nothing against gender equality, going in both directions.

I just hope that the horrific pressure towards being normatively beautiful that girls have experienced forever, is not going to be there for boys now as well.

One day you worry about pimples, the next day you feel too fat. And body image troubles have now reached young men in frightening numbers as well.

 https://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/learn/general-information/research-on-males

 

  • In the United States, 20 million women and 10 million men will suffer from a clinically significant eating disorder at some time in their life, including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, or EDNOS [EDNOS is now recognized as OSFED, other specified feeding or eating disorder, per the DSM-5] (Wade, Keski-Rahkonen, & Hudson, 2011).

Worries about a focus on external beauty today has been brought to you by the color PINK.