Browsing Category

Poetry

Thoughts on Experience

The Wild Swans at Coole

BY WILLIAM BUTLER YEATS

The trees are in their autumn beauty,
The woodland paths are dry,
Under the October twilight the water
Mirrors a still sky;
Upon the brimming water among the stones
Are nine-and-fifty swans.

The nineteenth autumn has come upon me
Since I first made my count;
I saw, before I had well finished,
All suddenly mount
And scatter wheeling in great broken rings
Upon their clamorous wings.

I have looked upon those brilliant creatures,
And now my heart is sore.
All’s changed since I, hearing at twilight,
The first time on this shore,
The bell-beat of their wings above my head,
Trod with a lighter tread.

Unwearied still, lover by lover,
They paddle in the cold
Companionable streams or climb the air;
Their hearts have not grown old;
Passion or conquest, wander where they will,
Attend upon them still.

But now they drift on the still water,
Mysterious, beautiful;
Among what rushes will they build,
By what lake’s edge or pool
Delight men’s eyes when I awake some day
To find they have flown away?

Don’t sweat the details. Trees displayed late, not early autumn beauty. The paths were muddy, not dry. It was December daylight, not October twilight, and there were surely fewer than 59 swans. A number, I am told that signified something other than reality in any case in the poem, since swans do not congregate in such large flocks and if they did you couldn’t count them…

Other than that, I thought Yeats perfectly captured the experience during my current jaunts. There is the splendor of late autumn, caught in all the rusts and russets, garnet, oranges and gingers I’ve been walking amongst.  There is that sense that the lighter steps are a thing of the past, and treading is a bit harder with approaching age.  The heart sore?   Nature’s beauty immutable? Ok, Yeats could not have possibly heard about the climate crisis, so we give him a pass on that. Future can only be guessed at? , again.

I know I sound like a broken record, but for me something that transcends the particulars of a given time and/or historical setting, is necessary if not sufficient to make it art. I don’t know the particulars of the Irish turmoil and rebellion in 1916 that literary critics link to the poem, as they do to Yeat’s personal misery as a refused lover, who feared to be cut off from happiness in his approaching twilight years. And I don’t need to know them.

The description of someone seeing time pass by and fearing changes that are not kind, stand on their own, an experience known to all of humanity. The fact of nature’s beauty existing independently from us is timeless – and could be read as a reminder not to take ourselves too serious after all, but be grateful for the lovely cyclic permanence around us. Then again, the juxtaposition of nature, beautiful in each of its stages, but also guaranteed a renewal after each season, and our own linear progression towards a winter without spring, is rather depressing, don’t you think? The words resonate.

Quick, the reliable sharpness of Margaret Atwood to the rescue:

Hm, pull back a bit from exhortation and despair, and come to your own conclusions about a poem written over a century ago, which provided an experiential understanding if not of human impact, then of human frailty.

Not a great help, either….. but maybe I am indeed coming to the wrong conclusions.

(Poem from Atwood’s new collection: Dearly.)

Here are two different versions of the poem set to music.

Photographs were taken in the last 5 days, at Oaks Bottom, 1000 Acres and at the Ankeny Wildlife Blind.

Reds against Blues

Hard times when sadness hits. Advice comes in all forms and shapes and levels of triteness (if earnestly felt), levels of pragmatism, levels of wishful thinking, or levels of abandon to a higher power. Nothing wrong with picking and choosing among the options, whatever appeals, as long as it lifts the dark.

Today’s Smörgåsbord (some of it found in selected offerings by Maria Popova’s incomparable newsletter BrainPickings) includes

the “human connection and plants will heal” variety,

and the “God will right it, but in the meantime, for God’s Sake, stay busy” variety,

found in a letter by Charles Dickens, written in 1862 to console his grieving sister:

I do not preach consolation because I am unwilling to preach at any time, and know my own weakness too well. But in this world there is no stay but the hope of a better, and no reliance but on the mercy and goodness of God. Through those two harbours of a shipwrecked heart, I fully believe that you will, in time, find a peaceful resting-place even on this careworn earth. Heaven speed the time, and do you try hard to help it on! It is impossible to say but that our prolonged grief for the beloved dead may grieve them in their unknown abiding-place, and give them trouble. The one influencing consideration in all you do as to your disposition of yourself (coupled, of course, with a real earnest strenuous endeavour to recover the lost tone of spirit) is, that you think and feel you can do. . . . I rather hope it is likely that through such restlessness you will come to a far quieter frame of mind. The disturbed mind and affections, like the tossed sea, seldom calm without an intervening time of confusion and trouble.

But nothing is to be attained without striving. In a determined effort to settle the thoughts, to parcel out the day, to find occupation regularly or to make it, to be up and doing something, are chiefly to be found the mere mechanical means which must come to the aid of the best mental efforts.

There is the “always look for the bright side” variety (alas communicated by an artist who took his own life after decades of depression, by drinking a glass of cholera infected water no less) Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky:

I am sitting at the open window (at four a.m.) and breathing the lovely air of a spring morning… Life is still good, [and] it is worth living on a May morning… I assert that life is beautiful in spite of everything! This “everything” includes the following items: 1. Illness; I am getting much too stout, and my nerves are all to pieces. 2. The Conservatoire oppresses me to extinction; I am more and more convinced that I am absolutely unfitted to teach the theory of music. 3. My pecuniary situation is very bad. 4. I am very doubtful if Undine will be performed. I have heard that they are likely to throw me over. In a word, there are many thorns, but the roses are there too.

Of course there’s also Emily Dickinson, who knew that in the end, advice is useless. (And who knew how to mess with readers’ expectations – the poem below could be anything, a description of depression, a descent into madness, an ode to forgetting something traumatic, or a REALLY bad migraine….)

I felt a Funeral, in my Brain

BY EMILY DICKINSON

I felt a Funeral, in my Brain,
And Mourners to and fro
Kept treading – treading – till it seemed
That Sense was breaking through –

And when they all were seated,
A Service, like a Drum –
Kept beating – beating – till I thought
My mind was going numb –

And then I heard them lift a Box
And creak across my Soul
With those same Boots of Lead, again,
Then Space – began to toll,

As all the Heavens were a Bell,
And Being, but an Ear,
And I, and Silence, some strange Race,
Wrecked, solitary, here –

And then a Plank in Reason, broke,
And I dropped down, and down –
And hit a World, at every plunge,
And Finished knowing – then –

(How I a d o r e Dickinson – that final ambiguity, finished knowing – it could be the end of knowing, or a state of arrival after plunging where you now know….)

May the planks of reason be sturdy and refuse to break. May a neighbor bring you amaryllis. May your day be busy with a structure that has meaning. May this endless rain stop so I can go out and forget everything while photographing plenty of rose hips among the thorns! November’s red confetti.

Muskrat baby (in November?) agrees – saw him this week.

“Finding immortality, one pumpkin at a time.”

“Finding immortality, one pumpkin at a time,” was reportedly uttered by Fight Club author Chuck Palahniuk in response to the work of the Maniac Pumpkin Carvers, Marc Evan and Chris Soria. (I am skipping his newest book published this September, The Invention of Sound, all about mortality in its most sadistic forms….)

The Brooklyn, NY-based duo has been carving pumpkins for many years. One of their approaches, carving famous works of art into their pumpkins, has been recognized by New York’s Museum of Modern Art. MoMa has ordered an annual pumpkin devoted to a piece from their collection for the last 7 years, so has the Whitney and the Queens Museum of Art. And now Chuck Palahniuk.

Here is a sampling of their work, done these days in cooperation with 12 other carvers, using tools from different trades, including kitchen knives, hardware tools, such as small saws, serrated knives, linoleum cutters (typically used for printmaking), and clay loops (used for trimming in pottery). (Photographs from the website.)

Keith Haring
Van Gogh

The pumpkins, internally wired with little lamps, can cost up to $800. That is a lot for a fleeting pleasure, and not much if you consider the skill that goes into it and the fact that this is probably a one-shot-per-year business.

To put the word immortality and pumpkin into one sentence requires some chutzpah. I cannot think of another organism widely available to observe, perhaps with the exception of sunflowers when they go dry and black, that reminds me so visibly of death and decay. Who hasn’t thought about the fleeting of existence when watching the crisp pumpkins melting into pulp and slime, on one’s doorstep as much as in the fields come winter?

On my visit to Sauvie Island yesterday, the fields were ready to be picked, the greenery already gone, the pumpkins bare for the take. It poured, I could not even leave the car, photographing out of the window. My favorite willow tree had finally collapsed under its own weight, pieces stacked along Reeder Road.

The ponds were dry, not good for November when so much traveling water fowl needs a place to settle.

(The red dirt is where usually the pond resides)

As a result a universe of hunters concentrated around one of the few remaining wet spots, killing scores of ducks by the unrelenting sound of the shooting.

Mortality was on my mind, not immortality. Beauty, of course, as always is the case in nature, visible even in the stark reminders of transience.

Then again, the quest for immortality, or ruminations about it, have also created some – literary – beauty. The ancient Greek texts come to mind, or Wordsworth, but also something decidedly contemporary. Here is Brian Culhane.

THE IMMORTALITY ODE

Bill Evans is quiet, fingers still above the keys,
But ready to begin again and again and again
The first twelve bars before the drums come in,
Just as I am ready for inspiration this evening,
Fingers rehearsing an entrance above the keyboard
Of the Olivetti Lettera 32 I pounded years ago
On Charles Street, nights I wore my father’s
Black cashmere overcoat whenever the steam
Failed to make it up five flights, and back then
Evans waited, too, for his entrance, rain on glass
Waiting to accompany him, and on the B side?
Everlastingness is still there, and all Camus
Said it was, the boulder, the hill, the boulder again
That we come to over and over, pushing—
Quaquaquaqua with white beard quaquaquaqua
As Lucky said and which my annotated Beckett
Traces to the Latin (qua) for in the capacity of.
As in I qua Sisyphus, I quaquaquaqua greybeard
Old father shuffling along in black cashmere:
The Child is father of the Man, a looped immortality,
While happiness, per Camus, if patently absurd,
Nonetheless may rise with the struggle to old heights
And just might be enough to fill a man’s heart,
Even as Evans once more lifts his fingers for
“You and the Night and the Music,” his solo fresh
As when he first sat down, and the night is young.

And here the referenced music by Bill Evans. Stay alive for now, folks. We need to be around for the official calling of the election…..

Look Forwards, Stockholm

Yesterday poet Louise Glück was awarded the 2020 Nobel Prize in Literature. On the positive side, a great decision in favor of poetry over prose, in favor of a woman, in favor of a lifetime accomplishment that impresses with cohesion of topics. A deserved recognition for a woman who overcame numerous, diverse obstacles in her own life, able to make use of the particulars and tying them to the general issues we all are confronting, precisely written up within the framework of her enormous knowledge about and familiarity with the classics, particularly Greek mythology. A poet equally applauded and criticized for her confessional style, and her penchant for dark topics, melancholic tone.

On the other hand, and you knew that would be coming, did we really need a decision in favor of a “safe” candidate, a writer in the realm of the past, with classic, European roots? Are the recurring topics – – betrayal, love, loss and mortality – – what matters most these days, or should we not celebrate someone whose feminism reaches beyond what’s generally seen as a consensus feminism? Someone who forces us to understand the relationship between the political and the personal with inescapable force of language? Where are the heiresses to Audre Lorde or Adrienne Rich, since these writers are no longer with us? Where is acknowledgement for international poets who are not familiars within the White canon?

Glück has won about every literary prize there is. There is no doubt about her deserved standing among the best of contemporary poets. I am more dismayed by the “play it safe” by a Nobel committee which has been riddled with scandals, and perhaps tried to calm a world that is grappling with catastrophic burdens. Here is the reasoning for the prize:…. “for her unmistakable poetic voice that with austere beauty makes individual existence universal.”…. “seeks the universal, and in this she takes inspiration from myths and classical motifs, present in most of her works.”

Individual existence might not be universal, after all, when the color of your skin determines how your life – and death – unfolds.

Here is a NYT interview with her from yesterday after she received the news. I read this after I wrote the blog, happy for the expressed sentiment.

Here is one of my favorite poems of Glück’s, providing a fine assessment of dire reality and simultaneously a forceful invitation to preserve hope.

NEST

A bird was making its nest.
In the dream, I watched it closely:
in my life, I was trying to be
a witness not a theorist.

The place you begin doesn’t determine
the place you end: the bird

took what it found in the yard,
its base materials, nervously
scanning the bare yard in early spring;
in debris by the south wall pushing
a few twigs with its beak.

Image
of loneliness: the small creature
coming up with nothing. Then
dry twigs. Carrying, one by one,
the twigs to the hideout.
Which is all it was then.

It took what there was:
the available material. Spirit
wasn’t enough.

And then it wove like the first Penelope
but toward a different end.
How did it weave? It weaved,
carefully but hopelessly, the few twigs
with any suppleness, any flexibility,
choosing these over the brittle, the recalcitrant.

Early spring, late desolation.
The bird circled the bare yard making
efforts to survive
on what remained to it.

It had its task:
to imagine the future. Steadily flying around,
patiently bearing small twigs to the solitude
of the exposed tree in the steady coldness
of the outside world.

I had nothing to build with.
It was winter: I couldn’t imagine
anything but the past. I couldn’t even
imagine the past, if it came to that.

And I didn’t know how I came here.
Everyone else much further along.
I was back at the beginning
at a time in life we can’t remember beginnings.

The bird
collected twigs in the apple tree, relating
each addition to existing mass.
But when was there suddenly mass?

It took what it found after the others
were finished.
The same materials – why should it matter
to be finished last? The same materials, the same
limited good. Brown twigs,
broken and fallen. And in one,
a length of yellow wool.

Then it was spring and I was inexplicably happy:
I knew where I was: on Broadway with my bag of groceries.
Spring fruit in the stores: first
cherries at Formaggio. Forsythia
beginning.

First I was at peace.
Then I was contented, satisfied.
And then flashes of joy.
And the season changed – for all of us,
of course.

And as I peered out my mind grew sharper.
And I remembered accurately
the sequence of my responses,
my eyes fixed on each thing
from the shelter of the hidden self:

first, I love it.
Then, I can use it.

from  Vita Nova by Louise Glück.

Here are two different bird’s nest songs.

What are days for?

Today is my son’s birthday, he’s still in his 20s. As we are living through day after day after day filled with medical challenges and untreatable pain, the question or, really, assertion posed by Philip Larkin of where can we live but days has taken on a new quality.

Larkin was a lugubrious sort, in addition to being often misogynistic, racist, xenophobic, smutty, sarcastic and generally unpleasant. (Read Andrew Motion’s Biography Philip Larking: A Writer’s Life if you don’t take my word for it.)

But, oh, did he know how to put a finger on exactly the spot where we, in grief or fear or need, end up asking ourselves, “Now, what?” And with insights softened by wit, he made clear that we face but the choice to muddle on. Or through. Happiness/Schmappiness – the routine of the days, their inevitable structure around burden, will carry us, lest we consent to sink into madness or forfeit the will to live – psychiatrist and priests, in their flapping, ridiculous garments, not exactly to the rescue, haste notwithstanding.

I truly find the poem and its imagery uplifting, motivational in its acknowledgment that happiness – that strange promise – might still be attainable if we agree to be content with something different from what we had aspired to.

What are days for? They are for healing. For finding courage. For flexibility in the face of challenging times. Or so I tell myself, rather avoidant of the flappy coat professions.

Days

BY PHILIP LARKIN

What are days for?
Days are where we live.   
They come, they wake us   
Time and time over.
They are to be happy in:   
Where can we live but days?

Ah, solving that question
Brings the priest and the doctor   
In their long coats
Running over the fields.

Philip Larkin, “Days ” from Whitsun Weddings. Copyright © Estate of Philip Larkin.  Reprinted by permission of Faber and Faber, Ltd.

Photographs today are from San Francisco’s Palace of the Fine Arts. It was designed by Bernard Maybeck to exhibit European art at the 1915 World’s Fair, the Panama-Pacific International Exhibition celebrating the completion of the Panama Canal in an attempt to show the world that San Francisco had risen from the ashes of the devastating 1906 earthquake and fire.

It is a strange building, reminiscent of a folly (a costly ornamental building with no practical purpose, especially a tower or mock-Gothic ruin built in a large garden or park as the Oxford dictionary defines it) albeit a folly on steroids. Larkin would have had a run with it. Meant to evoke a ‘sad, minor note’ of ‘an old Roman ruin – now why would you want that for a celebratory world fair??? – the Rotunda featured numerous weeping women, their backs turned to the viewer, covering their faces in their hands. Sculptor Ulric Ellerhusen crated the melancholy figures to enhance the sense of mystery desired by Maybeck.

They were granted more days than they probably wanted – unless the fires of the homeless, still smoldering when I visited in early morning hours, get out of hand.

“…the Palace of Fine Arts was built for temporary use, and construction materials were chosen almost as if they were building a stage set. All the columns, figures, walls and entablatures were made of plaster.After the fair, when most other structures were destroyed, the Palace of Fine Arts got a pass from the wrecking ball.

It was saved by the Palace Preservationist League, founded by Phoebe Apperson Hearst, the mother of William Randolph Hearst. However, due to the weak materials it was made from, as the years passed, it became in desperate need of repair. In the 1960s it was completely reconstructed, using more lasting materials like concrete. And after seismic retrofitting was completed in 2009, it looks like these ladies will be weeping well into the future.” (Ref.)

The 1960s renovation almost did not happen – only after Walter Johnson, a philanthropist, stepped forward with a substantial 2 million dollar starting contribution did the city manage to secure bonds and the state added the rest to complete the 3 year renovation.

The weeping ladies had a reprieve – may there be happy tears within their days, at least on occasion.

Days are where we live – let’s not lose our heads over that.

Music today by Scriabin who died in 1915, a piece often heard in our household.

Looks about Right

The Changing Light

By Lawrence Ferlinghetti

The changing light
            at San Francisco
    is none of your East Coast light
            none of your
                    pearly light of Paris


The light of San Francisco
            is a sea light
                    an island light
And the light of fog
                blanketing the hills


        drifting in at night
              through the Golden Gate


                    to lie on the city at dawn
And then the halcyon late mornings
          after the fog burns off
                and the sun paints white houses
                      with the sea light of Greece
          with sharp clean shadows 


                making the town look like
                      it had just been painted

But the wind comes up at four o’clock
                  sweeping the hills

And then the veil of light of early evening

And then another scrim
              when the new night fog
                        floats in
And in that vale of light
                the city drifts
                      anchorless upon the ocean

The poet is 101 years old, his words will hopefully last as long as the light. My camera, on the other hand, will not last that long, courtesy of the fog….

SFJAZZ.org presented Zakir Hussain & Dave Holland on October 20th, 2017, in SFJAZZ’s Miner Auditorium, here performing “Finding the Light.”

Crows, Pursued.

I have written about crows before, describing my fascination with and admiration for corvids.

New research results have the birds back on my mind, as did observing their antics during a short walk on the beach when the air cleared.

The newest neurobiological evidence claims that crows have a kind of consciousness previously believed to only exists in humans and macaque monkeys. Should we trust those claims? They are based on the the fact that the 1.5 billion neurons in a crow’s brain are architecturally arranged in similar ways as are our’s, and that they seem to fire in a similar manner to our’s when we consciously experience something or relate that we are experiencing something.

I am always weary of the “if it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it must be a duck!” kind of arguments pursuing the quest to find ourselves in other forms of life. To equate forms of neuronal reactions to our human consciousness is a huge step; I would be much happier if people cautiously formulated that along a continuum of reacting to a stimulus directly on one end to having thoughts about one’s reaction, or being aware of one’s thoughts on the other end of the scale, some biological entities approach us more closely than others, but all in degrees.

There is no question that corvids are extremely smart, but why insist that their experience is the same as ours, when you are a scientist? Let’s leave that to the poets. And none has done a better job of pursuing crows as conscious, questing heroes than Ted Hughes in his book Crow, From the Life and Songs of a Crow (1970.) Recovering from the loss of his wife through suicide, he responded to the American artist Leonard Baskin’s request to write a collection that would complement Baskin’s crow-focussed artwork.

Crow, born from a nightmare in the story, is an ultimately inadequate hero on a quest. Lots of mythological and folkloric tidbits are woven into the narrative, and this little hero is very much like a traditional trickster, challenging, funny, amoral, sometimes destructive and always sharp.

Here is one of Hughes’ poems that fits perfectly with my recent observations of crows (and brought home how many birds I am sorely missing) at the edge of the ocean:

Aware of their thoughts or not, they sure know how to survive, and seem to have fun while at it. My kind of model!

Music today was inspired by Hughes’ book – the piece by Benjamin Dwyer is called Crow’s Vanity. For a bit more cheerful enjoyment let’s have Charlie Parker guide us into the weekend with Ornithology.

Good intentions, predictable outcomes.

Three days before his accident my son moved into his new digs on the Bay side of San Francisco. The neighborhood is a vibrant mix of old, moneyed houses up and down Protero hill, industrial buildings now converted into lofts, about a million car mechanic and auto body shops, the medical school and its adjacent hospitals, a Louis Vitton meets McNuggets mix of sorts.

And then there are whole street sides covered with tents of the unhoused who find protection in group settings. With one of them, Chavalle, who stays across the front door of the building, I am on a daily greeting basis.

When my son was still mostly confined to a wheelchair and the air was not too unhealthy, we would push it the 4 blocks down to the bay and sit and watch the action – ships coming in and out, cranes moving loads, backhoes digging sand from the channel, fishermen trying their luck in the grossly polluted waters.

One day a guy came with a big carton filled with crabs. One by one he released them into the water, taking note of it by filming his proceedings. I chatted him up and he said that he had bought the whole lot for a bunch of money intent on setting them free and not having them boiled to death for someone’s dinner.

Good intentions. Alas, the crabs were someone’s dinner after all. Maybe not all of them, perhaps some escaped. Let’s work on that glass half full perspective….

Below is one of the best descriptions of eating these critters I have ever read, with added food for thought when it comes to hunger. The poet, Kay Ulanday Barrett, identifies as mixed Filipinx and White American heritage and has recently published a book on their experience as a disabled transgender queer. Here is their website.

Aunties love it when seafood is on sale.

By Kay Ulanday Barrett

In summertime, the women
in my family spin sagoo
like planets, make
even saturn blush.
They split the leaves
of kang kong with
riverbed softness.

They are precise;
measure rice by palm lines
with laughter and season
broth made of creature’s last gasps.
You’d swear they were
teenagers again, talking gossip
stretching limbs
elastic, durable, like seaweed.

     Come dinner time,
skilled mouths slurp
through the domes of
shrimp and crab. 

They
prize the fat,
the angles of their teeth
splinter claw, snap sinew,
dip tart into sweet
then back again;
bitterness balanced,
succulence on succulence,
is to find flesh from even the
smallest of spaces.

Women who swallow whole,
who make a pile of bones,
who suck teeth,
taste every morsel,
so that all that is left
is a quiet room
and shells of what once was.

To the daughters of dried fish nets
whose dreams dragged on sand,
dragged to this country,
they bring home recipe years later,
flick joints to garlic,
salabat to the sick,
culinary remix, teach cousins,
this is how we stay alive,
mourning in the Midwest
by taste bud.

Afterwards, they keep the ocean
husks for another meal
because to get a good deal
is to double.
And anybody from the island
will tell you,
that is where true flavor is

and what is hunger
anyway, but the carving
out of emptiness,
the learning you gotta always
always save something
for later?

And here is, how can I not, a crab canon. A crab canon is an arrangement of two musical lines that are complementary and backward, similar to a palindrome. It originally referred to a kind of canon in which one line is played backward. J.S Bach’s Musical Offerings has the perfect one.

The Bright Sun was extinguish’d.

Forgive me if my mind wanders even more than usual these days. I used to think of my habit of forming strange and far-reaching connections as an asset; these days associations come unbidden, feeling more intrusive than clever or surprising. Be that as it may, here is the most recent chain of thought, originally triggered by a day of darkness.

Literal darkness, that is, as you can discern yourself when realizing today’s photographs were taken at noon, overlooking San Francisco Bay, some days ago. A darkness likely to have enshrouded the Oregon landscape as well, a consequence of the devastating fires.

It brought to mind Lord Byron’s poem, Darkness, attached below. It was written in the summer of 1816 after the explosion of the Indonesian volcano Mount Tambora in 1815. The eruption killed more than 10,000 people, while an additional 30,000 across the world perished from the crop failures, famine, and disease that resulted from extreme weather triggered by the explosion. Volcanic ash blotted out much of the sun for more than a year, having people believe that the sun was dying. The average global temperature dropped by a whole degree. The poem reads like a prescient description of both climate change and/or the more figurative darkness that surrounds us in these days of the demise of our democracy.

Darkness

BY LORD BYRON (GEORGE GORDON)

I had a dream, which was not all a dream. 
The bright sun was extinguish’d, and the stars 
Did wander darkling in the eternal space, 
Rayless, and pathless, and the icy earth 
Swung blind and blackening in the moonless air; 
Morn came and went—and came, and brought no day, 
And men forgot their passions in the dread 
Of this their desolation; and all hearts 
Were chill’d into a selfish prayer for light: 
And they did live by watchfires—and the thrones, 
The palaces of crowned kings—the huts, 
The habitations of all things which dwell, 
Were burnt for beacons; cities were consum’d, 
And men were gather’d round their blazing homes 
To look once more into each other’s face; 
Happy were those who dwelt within the eye 
Of the volcanos, and their mountain-torch: 
A fearful hope was all the world contain’d; 
Forests were set on fire—but hour by hour 
They fell and faded—and the crackling trunks 
Extinguish’d with a crash—and all was black. 
The brows of men by the despairing light 
Wore an unearthly aspect, as by fits 
The flashes fell upon them; some lay down 
And hid their eyes and wept; and some did rest 
Their chins upon their clenched hands, and smil’d; 
And others hurried to and fro, and fed 
Their funeral piles with fuel, and look’d up 
With mad disquietude on the dull sky, 
The pall of a past world; and then again 
With curses cast them down upon the dust, 
And gnash’d their teeth and howl’d: the wild birds shriek’d 
And, terrified, did flutter on the ground, 
And flap their useless wings; the wildest brutes 
Came tame and tremulous; and vipers crawl’d 
And twin’d themselves among the multitude, 
Hissing, but stingless—they were slain for food. 
And War, which for a moment was no more, 
Did glut himself again: a meal was bought 
With blood, and each sate sullenly apart 
Gorging himself in gloom: no love was left; 
All earth was but one thought—and that was death 
Immediate and inglorious; and the pang 
Of famine fed upon all entrails—men 
Died, and their bones were tombless as their flesh; 
The meagre by the meagre were devour’d, 
Even dogs assail’d their masters, all save one, 
And he was faithful to a corse, and kept 
The birds and beasts and famish’d men at bay, 
Till hunger clung them, or the dropping dead 
Lur’d their lank jaws; himself sought out no food, 
But with a piteous and perpetual moan, 
And a quick desolate cry, licking the hand 
Which answer’d not with a caress—he died. 
The crowd was famish’d by degrees; but two 
Of an enormous city did survive, 
And they were enemies: they met beside 
The dying embers of an altar-place 
Where had been heap’d a mass of holy things 
For an unholy usage; they rak’d up, 
And shivering scrap’d with their cold skeleton hands 
The feeble ashes, and their feeble breath 
Blew for a little life, and made a flame 
Which was a mockery; then they lifted up 
Their eyes as it grew lighter, and beheld 
Each other’s aspects—saw, and shriek’d, and died— 
Even of their mutual hideousness they died, 
Unknowing who he was upon whose brow 
Famine had written Fiend. The world was void, 
The populous and the powerful was a lump, 
Seasonless, herbless, treeless, manless, lifeless— 
A lump of death—a chaos of hard clay. 
The rivers, lakes and ocean all stood still, 
And nothing stirr’d within their silent depths; 
Ships sailorless lay rotting on the sea, 
And their masts fell down piecemeal: as they dropp’d 
They slept on the abyss without a surge— 
The waves were dead; the tides were in their grave, 
The moon, their mistress, had expir’d before; 
The winds were wither’d in the stagnant air, 
And the clouds perish’d; Darkness had no need 
Of aid from them—She was the Universe.

 

________________________________________________________

The poem’s apocalyptic tone was not just caused by the strange, dark weather. Byron himself was at one of the lowest points in his life, his reputation shattered by revelations of his incestuous relationship with a half-sister, and public disclosure of his marital cruelty (he was sexually and emotionally abusive to his partners, men and women alike, throughout his life time.) He left England in disgrace at age 28, never to return again, wracked by debt and alcoholism. He died in exile from illness contracted through exposure to the elements. Notorious to the last, and yet he was a shining star in romantic poetry’s firmament, of bright intensity or intense brightness, your pick.

—————————————————————————————————————-

Notorious is also a term for me, for many of us, prominently associated with RBG. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, may her memory be a blessing, died last week on the eve of Rosh Hashanah, a bright sun extinguish’d. For all she fought for, trailblazed, conquered, for a life lived with integrity at the opposite end of the spectrum from Byron, she, too was not granted a peaceful death. The very knowledge that her passing would be exploited for yet another power grab by those who care for nothing but, must have weighed heavily for someone ready to be freed from the ravages of cancer and yet clinging to life in hopes of gaining time towards the election. It was not to be.

We must mourn her, and then tend to her legacy by whatever means we have. I find it heartening to be reminded that this is not on individuals alone. If you reread the poem above, look at the lines that signal connectedness – “And men were gather’d round their blazing homes 
To look once more into each other’s face” – we are in this together. Or the lines that point to a future, even if shrouded by fear – “A fearful hope was all the world contain’d.”  And then various descriptions of how people, other than those giving up, acted on that hope.

The poem does not end happily, but rather in desolation. That is a choice, but one the poet himself did ultimately not give into. Byron dreamt of revolutionary changes for the world and actually fought for social justice in his few years in government service. So did Bader Ginsburg in her reckonings with the powers that be. Here are Byron’s words from Canto IV of Childe Harold:

But I have lived, and have not lived in vain:
My mind may lose its force, my blood its fire,
And my frame perish even in conquering pain,
But there is that within me which shall tire
Torture and Time, and breathe when I expire [.]

For the rest of us: let’s tire, if not torture or time, then at least the current President and Senate hellbent on filling a Supreme Court Seat that does not belong to them. Make them weary with an onslaught of action. Exhaust them, weaken them by all means in our repertory. Unless darkness becomes the universe.

Music today uses the words from another Byron poem, She walks in Beauty. Rest in power, RBG. You have not lived in vain.

The Grace of the World

The Peace of Wild Things

by Wendell Berry

When despair for the world grows in me
and I wake in the night at the least sound
in fear of what my life and my children’s lives may be,
I go and lie down where the wood drake
rests in his beauty on the water, and the great heron feeds.
I come into the peace of wild things
who do not tax their lives with forethought
of grief. I come into the presence of still water.
And I feel above me the day-blind stars
waiting with their light. For a time
I rest in the grace of the world, and am free.