Four years ago I wrote a post about disaster porn, contemplating how we react to disaster movies and how we are prepared by them for what is happening in real life. It was one of my most clicked posts of all times – the word porn must have had a magnetic effect… – but I doubt that it was one of the most read ones, given its analytical rather than pornographic content.
I had meant to get back to the topic after watching a wildly successful Norwegian disaster film from 2016, The Wave, that eerily sketches a scenario we have now observed in real life. A mountain crumbling (in Nepal and Tibet a glacier melting that led to tectonic shifts and a rockslide), causing a catastrophic movement of water, a mudslide in real life, a tsunami in the movie. The unstoppable wave took everything in its path.
What happened in the Himalayas is in detail described here by folks who monitor and assess geological risks. Nepal is calling for climate compensation, as a moral obligation for India, China and the US who are world’s top industrial emitters of carbon dioxide. Their acceleration of climate change makes countries who are far less contributing to the world’s warming far more likely to be harmed by its effects. Thousands have died in the August Rasuwa flood, and more than 6000 are still missing. That is not counting all those who were physically harmed, or the loss of possession, physical structures, and economic disruption.
The disaster movie keeps us in the dark about how many people were killed by the environmental catastrophe. It focuses on human connections – on heroic people and people less so, who happen to meet “just ends” for their failures. The film is overall splendidly done, visually enticing, at the right level of narrative speed, some real scary action shots, sympathetic and talented actors

It drove me nuts, though, in its function to seed thoughts that good people, those you identify with from the beginning, almost always survive. Minimal outline: smart scientist and his family about to leave a touristy village where he worked in risk assessment as a geologist. He senses something is wrong when his team ignores data, partially afraid that a false alarm might disturb the village’s summer income from all those visitors. When the intuited catastrophe hits, he and his 7 year-old daughter miraculously survive the tsunami. Much focus on communal mutual aid during the escape scenes, and one or another peripheral character dies. Hero’s wife and their older son are trapped in the bomb shelter of the hotel where she works. He goes in to rescue them – after some drama, happy ending for the nuclear family.
The message here? If only they had heeded the warning, more could have escaped. (Wake-up call: in real life, those warnings often don’t exist, or the means to distribute them are absent, or escape routes are unavailable.) Catastrophes occur, but there will always be survivors! (This is true, but gives the false hope that you must be among them, through identification with the narrators through whose eyes you see the story unfold.) Good guys get rewarded, bad guys get their just desserts. (Not how life works.) Each one of those messages undermines our willingness to tackle the causes of disaster, climate change in particular, before it is too late.
***
Well, today’s focus is now on an entirely different wave, a destructive force of a different kind. A small German state had an election yesterday, with almost 78% of the voters casting a ballot (up from 60% 4 years ago.) The right-wing extremist party AfD (Alternative for Deutschland) got almost 44% of the vote, 3 seats short of a majority government in that state. For the remaining parties to be able to gain the majority for governing, all 5 would have to unite, which is incomprehensible given their ideologically differences.

It was a shock, if not a surprise. The most conservative party that currently leads the country with chancellor Merz, got absolutely trashed, despite their political maneuvering of adapting to, if not plain adopting some of the topics of AfD during the election campaigns, with ever increasing hatred towards immigrants and culturally “woke” populations. Calls for a prohibition of the AfD were ignored or seen as counter productive.
Here is the deal: In contrast to the United States, Germany has restrictions of what people can say and do, if those things undermine the democratic constituents of our legal order, endanger democracy itself. This was the hard won lesson from having succumbed to fascism (with Sachsen Anhalt, that same state, by the way, also electing the Nazis with 44% in 1933.) Never again was written all over these constitutional restrictions. In fact, people tried to prohibit a Nazi-aligned party, the NPD, under these guidelines, which the German Constitutional Court (our Supreme Court) denied. The core idea is that we cannot allow a majority vote for something that in turn establishes anti-democratic rule, no matter how many people buy into the authoritarian ideology and would be happy to give up their democratic rights if only their other needs – economic, psychological, tribal – are met.
I will attempt to describe the AfD party program in detail in my next blog, including their false promises and their copycat talking points containing Nazi benchmarks. I’ll also try to understand why so many people contributed to this brown wave, in a country that lived through the horrors of the first one, not so long ago. For now, I just need respond to the many messages I got last night, with people wondering about the parallels between here and there, the seeming rise of an authoritarian Right across the globe, now in a country that, of all of them, should know better.

Music today by Telemann who was born in what is today Sachsen Anhalt.
Here is a Poem for my German readers –
Bei Hitlers brennt noch Licht.
Es ist nie ganz erloschen,
nur eine kurze, ruhige Zeit war’s Fenster fest verschlossen.
Nur ab und zu, ganz schüchtern fast, kaum hörbar, ein Gewisper…
Man nahm’s kaum wahr und dachte sich: „Was soll’s? Da ist noch Licht an.“
Bei Hitlers brennt noch Licht – Jetzt treten sie ans Fenster.
Jetzt sieht man sie, jetzt hört man sie …
das sind keine Gespenster.
Ganz stolz und lautstark steh’n sie da, entzünden und krakeelen.
Und ihre Drohung ist ganz klar: „WIR GEHEN WIEDER WÄHLEN!“
Bei Hitlers brennt noch Licht.
Vernunft wo bist Du? Wo?
Komm‘ raus und hilf … und schalt‘ es aus.
… sonst brennt es lichterloh.
Simon Pearce or Erich Kästner – debates about origins….



























































































































































































